Comparison
Benny vs the alternatives
Honest, side-by-side comparisons of Benny the Doorman against the other browser-fingerprinting tools, including where each competitor still wins.
- Comparison
Benny vs ClientJS
ClientJS is the long-standing classic; Benny is a modern rebuild. Both free and open source. Side by side on signal coverage, cross-browser stability, the comparison API, anti-spoof scoring, and maintenance, including where ClientJS still fits.
Read the comparison - Comparison
Benny vs CreepJS
CreepJS is an open-source research tool for auditing browser entropy and detecting spoofing. It is not an npm-installable fingerprinting library. This page explains what CreepJS does, what it does not do, and when you want a production library instead.
Read the comparison - Comparison
Benny vs FingerprintJS
Looking for a FingerprintJS alternative you can self-host? Benny the Doorman is free and open source, with a cross-browser hardware ID and no SaaS tier or API key to start. Side by side with FingerprintJS OSS and Pro on signals, licensing, pricing, and who each is best for.
Read the comparison - Comparison
Benny vs ImprintJS
ImprintJS is a lightweight classic; Benny is a modern rebuild. Both free and open source. Side by side on signal coverage, cross-browser stability, the comparison API, anti-spoof scoring, and maintenance, including where ImprintJS still fits.
Read the comparison - Comparison
Benny vs SEON
SEON is a managed anti-fraud platform; Benny is a free, open-source fingerprinting library you host yourself. Side by side on scope, pricing, data residency, and when a full platform is the right call instead.
Read the comparison - Comparison
Benny vs ThumbmarkJS
Both are free and open source. The difference is what you get back: ThumbmarkJS returns one per-browser hash, Benny adds a cross-browser hardware ID and a built-in comparison API. Side by side on signals, licensing, and where ThumbmarkJS still wins.
Read the comparison
